Rh Bill

St. Jude College civilise of maneuver Science and Education Manila A Term Paper Submitted as a Requirement For the Subject Filipino regimen and Constitution Submitted By Jim Waine C. Averilla Karissa Helene B. Salvador Submitted To Dios papao B. Lopega March 27, 20 HISTORYAccording to the Sen take in Policy Brief titled Promoting procreative wellness, the history of generative health in the Filipinos dates gumption to 1967 when breaking winders of 12 countries including the Philippines Ferdinand Marcos bespeaked the declaration of race The Philippines agreed that the universe of discourse worry should be con statusred as the tip element for long-term sparingal evolution.Thus, the flock focus was created to foment for a gl ar family size norm and stick come out culture and services to get-goer fertility rates. Starting 1967, the USAID started raiseing 80% of the tot up family designateiness commodities (contraceptives) of the country, which coreed to US$ 3 bingle million million annu completelyy. In 1975, the get together States adopted as its insurance polity theNational Security matter Memorandum 200 Implications of piecewide existence Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200). The policy gives paramount importance to greenness riches assert prizes and the promotion of contraception among 13 thickly settled countries, including the Philippines to control rapid state produce which they deem to be inimical to the socio-political and frugal addition of these countries and to the theme interests of the coupled States, since the U. S. conomy forget require large and increasing amounts of minerals from wholly overseas, and these countries female genitalia produce destabilizing op mark squeezes against the United States. It recommends the US leadership to influence national leaders and that improved world-wide contain for tribe-related efforts should be sought through increase idiom on mass media and opposite universe statement and motivation programs by the UN, USIA, and USAID. un equal presidents had different transmits of emphasis. prexy Marcos pushed for a systematic dispersal of contraceptives either over the country, a policy that was ejaculateed coercive, by its leading administrator. The Cory Aquino administration localisesed on giving couples the discipline to hold in the follow of kidskinren they p cite, dapple the Ramos presidency shifted from macrocosm control to commonwealth anxiety. Estrada harbor assorted methods of step-d give fertility rates, objet dart Arroyo cogitate on mainstreaming inborn family supplying, while stating that contraceptives argon openly sold in the country.In 1989, the Philippine Legislators mission on sight and discip limn (PLCPD) was established, dedicated to the formulation of vi equal benignantkind policies requiring legislation on universe of discourse superintendment and socio- stintingal de velopment. In 2000, the Philippines signed the Millennium Declaration and committed to attain the MDG goals by 2015, including promoting grammatical gender par and health. In 2003, USAID started its phase pop of a 33-year-old program by which separated contraceptives were habituated to the country.Aid recipients such as the Philippines confront the challenge to p arntage its ingest contraception program. In 2004, the Department of Health introduced the Philippines pr planetative Self-Reliance Strategy, arranging for the replacement of these gainations with domestically provided contraceptives. In marvellous 2010, the disposal proclaimed a collaborative work with the USAID in implementing a comprehensive marketing and communication theory strategy in party favor of family planning called May Plano Sila. Summary of criticismOpp binglents of the proscriptionk n wiz bespeak that (1) The worlds leading scientific experts fox intractable the issues related to the disti nction and describe that the RH pinnacle is based on harm economics as the 2003 Rand Corporation learn verbalises that thither is tiny cross-country test that existence yield impedes or promotes economic growing. (2) The metre takes a manner express mail giving medication funds from treating near(prenominal) elevated priority medical exam and food take ups and transfers them to fund objectively prejudicious and fiendishly devices.The latest studies in scientific journals and organizations show that the ordinary birth control pill, and the intrauterine device atomic number 18 abortifacient to 100-celled human embryos they shoot the embryonic human, who as such argon human organisms play polish offly worthy of respect, making the saddle unconstitutional. (3) US National exculpation Consultant, Li sensationl Tiger, has shown empirical evidence that contraceptives maintain poisonous social readys (abortion, premarital charge up, female person impoverish ment, nonplus slight children, youngage pregnancies, and brusqueness).Harvard School of semipublic Health scientist Edward Green observes that when mass remember theyre made safe by development condoms at least or so of the sequence, they in right submit in stakeier sex, in the phenomenon called gamble compensation. There is evidence for increased risk of rear endcer (breast, cervical, popliver) as whole several(prenominal) as significant increase of risk for heart attack and stroke for received spendrs of oral contraceptives. The increased usage of contraceptives, which implies that slightly babies ar unwanted, intromit foring eventually lead to much(prenominal) abortion the orrelation was shown in a scientific journal and ack right forthledged by pro-RH leaders, (4) Peoples freedom to plan of attack contraceptives is non confine by whatsoever opposing honor, being available in family planning NGOs, stores, etc.tera The country is non a public a ssistance state taxationpayers money should non be used for personal practices that be harmful and immoral it can be used to aver multitude of the harm of BCPs. (5) The penal provisions constitute a rape of free weft and conscience, and establishes religious persecution. prexy Aquino state he was non an author of the visor. He in any case stated that he gives across-the-board place upright to a firm community policy, educating pargonnts to be trusdeucerthy, providing contraceptives to those who postulate for them, n incessantlytheless he scrapss to promote contraceptive use. He verbalize that his position is much aptly called dissolving agentable line rather than procreative health. economic and demographic premises The Philippines is the 39th closely densely populated country, with a constriction over 335 per squared kilometer, and the state offset rate is 1. % (2010 Census), 1. 957% (2010 est. by CIA World feature Book), or 1. 85% (20052010 game non- homogeneous estimate by the UN universe of discourse Division, World nation Prospects The 2008 Revision) coming from 3. 1 in 1960. The 2010 total fertility rate (TFR) is 3. 23 births per woman, from a TFR of 7 in 1960. In addition, the total fertility rate for the richest quintile of the community is 2. 0, which is slightly(predicate) one third the TFR of the wretchedest quintile (5. 9 children per woman). The TFR for women with college education is 2. , virtually half that of women with tho an elementary education (4. 5 children per woman). instance Lagman states that the criterion recognizes the verifiable link amongst a huge population and pauperisation. unchecked population increase stunts socioeconomic development and aggravates impoverishment. The University of the Philippines School of Economics presented devil text file in support of the tip universe and Poverty the Real Score (2004), and Population, Poverty, political sympathies and the Reproductive Heal th tear (2008).According to these economists, which complicate Solita Monsod, Gerardo Sicat, Cayetano Paderanga, Ernesto M. Pernia, and Stella Alabastro-Quimbo, rapid population growth and high fertility rates, especially among the little, do change poverty and organize it harder for the political relation to speak to it, while at the same(p) cadence clarifying that it would be extreme to visual sense population growth as the principal front of poverty that would unspoiltify the governance resorting to draconian and coercive measures to deal with the worry (e. g. denial of basic services and subsidies to families with to a greater extent than cardinal children). They illustrate the connection mingled with rapid population growth and poverty by comparing the economic growth and population growth rates of Thai charge, In usurpesia, and the Philippines, wherein the kickoff two grew to a greater extent(prenominal)(prenominal) rapidly than the Philippines pop-of-po cket to lower population growth rates. They accentuate that the experience from across Asia indicates that a population policy cum regime-funded family planning program has been a critical complement to sound economic policy and poverty reduction.In Population and Poverty, Aniceto Orbeta, Jr, showed that poverty incidence is higher among abundant families 57. 3% of Filipino families with seven children are in poverty while all 23. 8% of families who sustain two children live below the poverty threshold. Percentage of population living below poverty line (2003). Darker areas specify more poverty. Proponents argue that exquisite families and wider birth intervals turn outing from the use of contraceptives allow families to perpetrate more in each childs education, health, nutrition and eventually bring low poverty and hunger at the phratry level.At the national level, fertility reduction cuts the take up of social services with hardly a(prenominal)er state attending s chooling or want medical care and as pauperization eases for ho apply, transportation, jobs, water, food and otherwise natural resources. The Asian Development Bank in 2004 excessively listed a large population as one of the major causes of poverty in the country, together with weak macroeconomic management, exercise issues, an underperforming agricultural sector and an unfinished land reform agenda, brass instrument issues including flubion. Criticism of premisesOpponents refer to a 2003 register of Rand Corporation, which concluded that on that point is little cross-country evidence that population growth impedes or promotes economic growth population neutralism has in item been the dominant school in counting among academics more or less population growth for the last half-century. For example, the 1992 read of Ross Levine and David Renelt, which covered 119 countries over 30 eld (vs UP study of 3 countries over a few years). The RAND study in any case tell t hat a large population can promote growth given the right fundamentals.Thus, they refer to the HSBC 2012 projection for 2050 that the Philippines result be 16th largest thriftiness callable to its large growing population, and those whose populations are decrease depart suffer decline. In his basis which critiques the excite, Economist Roberto de Vera refers to Nobel prize winner Simon Kuznetss study which concludes that no clear association appears to exist in the present sample of countries, or is presumable to exist in other developed countries, between rates of growth of population and of product per capita. Julian Simon compared mate countries such as North and sulphur Korea, East and West Germany whose birthrates were often the same provided whose economic growth was solo different due to different governance factors. De Vera says that similar conclusions down been arrived at by the US National Research Council in 1986 and in the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) consult ative Meeting of Economists in 1992 and the studies of Hanushek and Wommann (2007), Doppelhoffer, Miller, Sala-I-Martin (2004), Ahlburg (1996), etc.The other Nobel plunder winner who expressed the same keep an eye on is Gary Becker. De Vera also states that from 1961 to 2000, as Philippine population increased almost lead times, poverty decreased from 59% to 34%. He stressed that the more probable cause of poor families is non family size but the limited schooling of the fieldhold head up 78% to 90% of the poor households had heads with no high school diploma, preventing them from getting better paying jobs.He refers to studies which show that 90% of the time the poor want the children they have as religious serviceers in the farm and induement for a secure old age. Instead of aiming at population decrease, De Vera stressed that the country should focus through education on cashing in on a possible demographic dividend, a period of rapid economic growth that can happens when the labor force is growing faster than the dependents (children and elderly), olibanum reducing poverty importantly.In a recent development, two authors of the Reproductive Health measuring changed their bristle on the provisions of the short letter regarding population and development. Reps. Emerciana de Jesus and Luzviminda Ilagan wanted to delete three provisions which state that gender equality and women empowerment are central elements of procreative health and population and development, which integrate answerable parenthood and family planning programs into anti-poverty initiatives, and which name the Population Commission as a arrange body.The two party-list representatives strongly state that poverty is not due to over-population but because of discrepancy and corruption. Opponents also refer to the statement of the conspiracy of Free Farmers that history teaches roughly the economic advantages of a large population, and the disadvantages of a smaller population. The Wall Street Journal in July 2012 give tongue to that Aquinos promotion of a reproductive health bill is jarring since it could lead to a demographic trap of to a fault few workers.The Philippines doesnt have too many people, it has too few pro-growth policies. Opposing the bill, Former finance Secretary Roberto de Ocampo wrote that it is in truth disingenuous for anyone to come about on the premise that the poor are to blame for the nations poverty. He emphasized that the government should apply the rule of maiden things first and focus on the root causes of the poverty (e. g. poor governance, corruption) and apply many other alternatives to solve the problem (e. g. giving up pork barrel, facts of life tax collection efficiency).They also point to the fiver factors for high economic growth and reduction of poverty shown by the 2008 Commission on Growth and Development headed by Nobel prize winner Michael Spence, which does not entangle population control. Status Legi slature On 31 January 2011, half-dozen different bills were coalesced into a angiotensin-converting enzyme RH annotation which was then unanimously approved for plenary debate by the domiciliate direction on Population and Family Relations. On 7 February 2011, the bill was scheduled to go sooner the plate Appropriations Committee. 6 February 2011 the bill was endorsed by the House Appropriations Committee with amendment and referred back to the Population Committee for finalizing the language. electric chair and Cabinet President Noynoy Aquino during the presidential campaign verbalise that it confounds him wherefore he is al modalitys associated with the RH bank bill and reiterated that he is neither an author nor a co-author, much less did he sign the committee report regarding the bill. He say that he ordain largey support the crafting of a firm policy that allow for address the serious problem on population. At the same time, Aquino said that insubstantial contra ception was a matter of choice and conscience and that health professionals who fool people into using artificial contraceptives should be penalized. As a Catholic, Aquino said he himself was not promoting artificial contraception but guesss that the government should be able to provide it to Filipinos who ask for it. Aquino stressed Im a Catholic, Im not promoting it. My position is more aptly called responsible parenthood rather than reproductive health.According to Rina Jimenez David who is pro-RH, during the Women Deliver Philippines multitude held September 2010, Dinky Soliman, Aquinos Secretary of societal Welfare and Development, said that choice and access constituted the keystone of the Aquino governments policy, reiterating the administrations support for the unfinished reproductive health bills. On celestial latitude 2010, the Cabinet and the CBCP agreed to have a joint campaign providing full information on the advantages and risks of contraceptives, natural and ar tificial family planning and responsible parenthood.They have established a technical working group for this purpose. They also agreed that government will not be an instrument to enforce or violate the conscience of the people about these issues. However, by April 2011 the President has given his full support to the consummate RH quantity in a speech at the University of the Philippines and promised to push for its passage even at the risk of excommunication. Compromise and alternativesSenate President Juan panderer Enrile, Congressman Roilo Golez and Buhay party-list separately filed bills that conk to define abortion and birth control use. These bills have been seen either as a override of the RH visiting card, its alternative, or as a way of achieving unity among the populace, since the RH send proponents have stated their concern in preventing abortion. Presidential candidate Gilbert Teodoro or Gibo suggested a cash transfer from the government to single(a)istics wan ting access to family planning methods, whether natural or artificial.The individuals can then make use of the cash they receive to bargain for birth control devices they whitethorn choose, thus guaranteeing freedom of choice. The Loyola School of Theology and the arse J. Carroll Institute on State and church Issues issued 9 Talking Points on the RH bill poster. Among other points, they proposed a study on the meaning of conception in the Constitution, and if it gist fertilization, abortifacients are to be banned even now and disregarding of whether the RH bill sticker is passed.They also proposed parallel programs for providing information and training, one for Natural Family Planning (NFP) and another for artificial methods of family planning. Columnist Jose Sison of the Philippine Star criticized this a Catholic School of theology has actually proposed in public, the use of tax payers money to train Filipinos to expend methods that are objectively and intrinsically evil -minded and cites empirical evidence and scientific proofs substantiative the harmful and evil effects of contraceptives to individuals and to partnership. upstart eventsIn September 2010, Aquino during this visit to the US reiterated his offer that he is in favor of responsible parenthood and respects the decision of each couple as to the number of children they want, and if they choose the government support for contraception, then the government will provide it. This statement has created a furor as Catholic church leaders say that Aquino has sold out the Filipino soul in swop for more or less measly aid from the United States. The President of the Catholic Bishops Conference said that at that place can possibly be an excommunication of the President if he continues on with his stance.Pro RH Bill Senators encouraged the President to be steadfast to do his duties towards the state. The Presidents phonation Edwin Lacierda explained that the President has not changed his s tand and is stretch out to the prelates and said that the President himself has not made any decision in support of the Reproductive Health Bill as he is still poring over the document. Lacierda said that the Executive Branch is not involved in the passage of the RH bill, saying the measures fate rests touch only on the legislative branch. Filipino Freethinkers, an association of agnostics, atheists, progressives, etc. , who have been actually active in the fight in favor of the RH bill, stepped up the pressure, creating more controversy that blast up renewed interest in the bill on two sides. On 30 September 2010, one of the freethinkers, Carlos Celdran represent a protest action against the Catholic Church, holding a sign which read DAMASO a reference to the villainous, corrupt man of the cloth Father Damaso of the novel Noli Me Tangere by Filipino revolutionary writer Jose Rizal and shouting reverse getting involved in government A fan page, Free Carlos Celdran was cr eated in Facebook, which generated 23,808 fans in 24 hours. Francisco Montalvan of the Inquirer said that in the end the Damasos are the scheming, corrupt and deceptive people, implying that the pro-death advocates are these, while the primordial Rosales who started a nationwide fund for the poor is very far from Damaso. Meanwhile, the imaum Council of the Philippines, the top leaders of the Moslem population which at 4. M constitutes 5% of the Philippine population, declared that they are against contraceptives since using them underestimates God, and makes one lose morality in the process. During the first public hearing on 24 Nov, the chair of the Committee on Population handling the bill said that there is no instruction from the vocaliser of the House to expedite the bill. Upon the call of anti-RH congressmen, the Committee pass firm to refer the bill also to the Committee on Health, since the bill is about Reproductive Health. loss leader of the pro-RH group, Elizabeth Ansioco, said that the bill is doomed if it is referred to the Committee on Health. Anti-RH De roamy loudspeaker system Congressman Pablo Garcia said the members of the Committee on Health know of the WHO announcement on the carcinogenicity of combined estrogen-progestogen oral contraceptives. House loudspeaker system Belmonte said that Congress is not likely to rush the legislation of the bill and will tackle it in plenary ahead of time next year. Belmonte said it is better that passing contentious bills be given more attention.On 3 declination, the Senate cut the proposed budget of P 880M for contraceptives down to P 8M for condoms since other contraceptives violate the Constitutions ban on abortifacients, and Senator Tito Sotto 3 said that his constituents never asked for contraceptives. On 27 July 2012, the Speaker of the House adjudicated to put to a vote by 7 overbearing 2012 whether the debates have to be terminated. In response, pro-life groups and the Catholic Bish ops Conference of the Philippines have decided to call for a Prayer force Rally, on 4 August 2012 at the historic Edsa Shrine.Meanwhile, 6 co-authors of the bill withdrew support, with the head of the minority group of the house declaring that 8 of their group are withdrawing their antecedent support for the bill. Congressional approval and presidential assent At 3 in the morning on celestial latitude 13, 2012, the House of Representatives voted on encourage reading in favor of the bill with 113109, while five representatives abstained. In the upper house, the Senate voted on December 18, 2012 to pass the bill on second reading with 138, while Senators Sergio Osmena, III and Lito Lapid were absent.On the same twenty-four hours, both houses passed the bill on the third and final reading. Members of the House of Representatives voted 13379, while seven representatives abstained. The Senate registered 138, the same result as the second reading. On December 19, 2012, both recitals of the bill were passed to the Bicameral Committee to produce a final version to be signed by the President Aquino. The committee quickly passed the bill in just one session.It was transmitted back to the House of Representatives and the Senate, which both ratified the bill, with the Senate balloting 115 in favor of ratification, and the House of Representatives voting via voice vote. On December 21, 2012, President Aquino signed the bill into natural law, codifying the bill as Republic get along No. 10354, otherwise known as the obligated Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012. News of the signing was denote by House Majority Leader Neptali Gonzales II on December 28, 2012. Reactions Averilla, Jim Waine C.Philippine regimen & Constitution I used to support the RH bill. But finding out the verity behind it, neither would you. I believe this law will put the Filipinos at risk of experimental extinction because at its very core, the RH law is an elongation of a secret, global conspiracy, a occidental attempt, to apply principles of eugenics on unsuspecting, inferior populations in order to prevent them from the human evolutionary process, at the end of which would, at the highest point, call forth the master race. The truth is in our hearts, we just have to harken to it.At first my interpretation of the RH bill led me to think that it was just a bill meant to assistance educate the uninstructed about ways to prevent them from fornicating their way to a very handsome fiscal moorage. My unlettered mind devised some simple points as to why the RH Bill was right. I fantasise 1. Minimum pay of a non-agricultural Filipino worker is P404. 2. If there were 20 working days in a month, the average minimum absorb earning Filipino would earn around P8000 a month. 3. In average that person ate food on a fixture basis, he will spend about around P70/day on food.There are 20 days in a month, so I guess that would equal to P2100 a month. 4. But if t his person had a partner, he world power want to diet her too. Feeding her would cost another P2100 a month. 5. P8000 P4200 = P3800 6. If this person and his wife rented a home, or used electricity and bathed from time to time, the amount left from his salary would be significantly fastend. Lets say their utility bills and rend amounted to P1800 7. P3800 P1800 = P2000 8. P2000 is a lot of money, but I weart think they should have more than 3 children right?Babies need milk, diapers, toys, privilege injections, bodge medicine, etc 9. From this lets take off that babies cost money. If babies cost money, I theorized that having more babies would cost more money. And from this data, I see that a person who spent a lot of money on children, but I didnt earn a lot of money, would soon be skint and unable to provide for both himself and his children. another(prenominal) word for broke situation is poverty. 10. I believe that a person can quash being poor by making less babies. So , I thought that steps should be taken to inform people about this very little known fact.I also thought that the government should make contraceptives accessible so that people who adoptt earn a lot can properly manage the little resources that they have. Thats why I supported the RH Bill. But now I know that I was revile. I believe that the issue of the RH Bill is not a religious issue. The RH Bill is defective because it assumes that the Philippines is overpopulated. -I agree. I, myself, have observed that the Philippines is not overpopulated. In fact, if you use your common sense and think about it, you will realize a few things 1. We are not overpopulatedLook at the mountains, the jungles, the caves and the marine floor. There are no people there 2. If we were really overpopulated, we would have dogfight traveling. But if you go to EDSA, theres no traffic. When you ride the MRT, its not packed with people. 3. Students in public schools are well educated because the teach er to scholarly person ratio is very low. In fact, because of our low population the government can fundamentally guarantee that all public school students are provided books, notebooks and other school supplies. The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that contraceptives are well-grounded for mankind and women. 1. I agree, the RH Bill/ justice is not good for women because it might draw a woman away from her one, true, universal purpose the uninterrupted employment of healthy babies 2. Furthermore, the role of women in society and the universe is to make babies. Thats why God made women. Thats their sole purpose in life. Theyre not good for anything else. Ever wonder why there are no women in the clergy? Because theyre not good enough. 3. Contraceptives would allow women to please the benefits of physical intimacy while maintaining a successful and productive career, if she so chooses.That is so wrong. Only men should be able to enjoy that privilege. 4. Women should get sign ificant all(prenominal) single time they have sex and only immoral women enjoy sex without the possibility of conception. In fact, a better alternative would be for women, in general, to follow the example made by Mother Mary to learn how to carry without having sex. The RH Bill/Law will put Filipinos at risk of extinction 1. Population decline is just detrimental for nations. Just look at the countries which have a declining population Italy, Japan and Singapore. Theyre in such a bad shape.The Philippines obviously has a better economy and has a higher literacy rate than these countries. In fact, many Italians, Japanese, and Singaporeans go to the Philippines for work. That only goes to show that a decline in population is bad for the economy. Our population is our spoiledgest asset 1. In my opinion, people should make as many babies as they can because the population is not a problem. In fact, the more babies a person has, the more assets he has. obturate real estate prop erties, stock investments, or Jollibee franchises. The real secret to increased wealth is babies. 2.If you have 15 babies, youre practically wealthy because babies are assets 3. If you need money, you can sell them 4. If you can keep them living until they can walk, they can one day beg for money in the streets theyre going to have to anyway because theres no way in hell youll be able to provide for all of them on your own 5. If ever a person is not able to feed the 15 babies he made, its the governments fault, because its the governments sole responsibility to make sure that every Filipino baby is fed. 6. The best way a person can afford to this country is to contribute to its population. The RH Bill/Law is wrong because it assumes that reproductive education and contraceptives will effectively reduce cases of abortion. 1. Reproductive/contraceptive education will have no effect on the number of abortion cases. In my opinion, these abortion cases will not fall because women w ill continue to have abortions regardless of whether they are pregnant or not. 2. Abortions cannot be prevented. Its just something that women naturally do. ilk shopping, for example. The RH Bill/Law is wrong because it will make people move into in extra-marital and pre-marital sex. 1.The RH Bill/Law will practically encourage our people to engage in immoral activities. 2. We must protect our moral values and worsen the RH Bill. Because, currently, not a single Filipino engages in pre-marital sex or extra-marital sex. Well at least this is what we believe until to this day. 3. The root cause of extra-marital and pre-marital sex is ones exposure to contraceptives. There is just something in contraceptives that people find very arousing. 4. In western countries, men enticement strange women into bed by shown those condoms. 5. If we ban condoms, absolutely no one would engage in premarital or extra-marital sex. The RH Bill/Law is wrong because it assumes that parents dont teach their children about sex. 1. The truth is that parents talk to their children about sex all the time. Its so not awkward. The dad usually tells his children how he takes off all his clothes, does a sexy Tiger grunt and makes sweet, sweet music with their mothers body. 2. Also, a fetch usually advises his girlfriend that if shes going to have sex with her boyfriend, she should use a condom. Sometimes the father even drives the daughter to the boyfriends house and waits for the couple to finish 3.Filipino daughters dont have sex without the fathers permission. Unwanted pregnancies or teen pregnancies never happen to Filipino girls. Thats why we do not need the RH Law The RH Bill is a conspiracy. Its all lies, all lies Salvador, Karissa Helene Philippine Government & Constitution It is very much unfortunate, disappointing, and alarming that nobody in the mainstream media talks about the veto, unintended consequences of the fascist Reproductive Health bill, now called Responsible Parenthood bill, on the countrys vexation sector, in particular small businesses.I decimate this legislative marriage offer primarily because its anti-reason, anti-individualism, and anti-capitalism. In other words it is against individual rights, liberty and economic freedom. This is just one of the many aspects of the bill that it can negatively impact the countrys industry, particularly small business establishments that employ millions of professionals and technical and even unskilled workers. Lets take a small cafeteria, canteen, or publishing house near your place. value about the small establishments and bar and eating place stools in malls and many places in the metro.These small businesses that put two to ten or so people will be one of the main targets of the RH bill supported by some misguided, honest hippies who are mostly schooled and professionals. besides nobody wants to talk about this issue. Its as if these pro-RH bill hippies and fanatics think that weal th is created by wishful thinking, that is, by just now passing an intrusive, rights-violating bill supposedly designed to help the poor and women. What these anti-population and pro-regulation advocates dont know is that the proposed legislative measure is itself a big insult to the poor and women.It is anti-poor and anti-women. The RH bill is a big insult to the poor because it treats them as dependent, parasites, worthless, or a leech who but deposit on other peoples extorted money or alms. Authors of the consolidated bill argue that one of the principal objectives of their super moderate, anti-intellectual measure is to help reduce poverty and achieve sustainable human development. Still, what these political idiots do not and refuse to understand is that the government has no fiscal capability to deliver the promises of their measure because it is already bankrupt.The government, which is the worst parasite in this country, is not a productive agency or entity. It can only deliver some of the promised public services by using state force, like taxation, regulation, and forcible immolation of some social sectors like businessmen and health care providers. The consolidated RH law is a huge insult to women and this is what statistician does not understand because it run acrosss them as inferior, ignorant, weak, having no mental, physical and emotional capability to decide on her own and to protect herself.It treats women as ignorant and weak because the laws advocates believe that they need to pass a highly intrusive, unconstitutional legislative proposal of marriage to provide them the information and services they need. Also, the proposal is a big insult to every Filipino family because it treats parents as irresponsible, ignorant, weak, lazy, and having no readiness to make informed, responsible family decisions. It is stated that the laws primary goal is to help give parents the opportunity to exercise their right to freely and responsibly plan the number and spacing of their children. Thats the other way of saying that Filipino parents are not free and badly need the help and assistance of the state so to responsibly plan the number and spacing of their children. The bills highly mediocre and ignorant explanatory note adds The bill is genuinely rights-based. It mandates the provision of all forms of family planning, both newfangled natural and artificial, to women and couples as long as they are legal and medically-safe, and truly effective. However, the betrothal and adoption is the option and decision of parents and couple, particularly women. If thats the case, why is there a need to pass the bill? The answer is because this is not what the bill is all about. In truth and in reality, it is about more political power Its about putting the entire business industry, medical profession and education sector under the total control and supervision of the state. In general, the bill is a BIG bruise to the entire Filipino nation that has someway embraced rational principles and the concept of freedom and individual rights. Those who ignorantly, naively take the consolidated bill at its face value will certainly accept the contradictory slogans.There are two sides of the consolidated bill the fantasy side and the reality side. The measures fantasy side can be readily gleaned from its highly ignorant explanatory note, which is filled with supportive statistics and some tragical information about the plight of the poor and women. They did not state how except the fact that they enumerated the bills nice-to-hear intents and provisions. The reality side of the measure is that all those promised, stated RH services would be covered or delivered by sacrificing, enslaving employers and health care providers.Section 18 states Employers Responsibilities- The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) shall batten that employers respect the reproductive rights of workers. Consistent with the intent of Artic le 134 of the Labor Code, employers with more than two hundred (200) employees shall provide reproductive health services to all employees in their own respective health facilities. Those with less than two hundred (200) workers shall enter into partnerships with hospitals, health facilities, or health professionals in their areas for the economy of reproductive health services.Employers shall furnish in piece the quest information to all employees and applicants (a) The medical and health benefits which workers are entitled to, including maternalism and paternity leave benefits and the availability of family planning services (b) The reproductive health hazards associated with work, including hazards that may affect their reproductive functions especially pregnant women and (c) The availability of health facilities for workers.What does this section mean? Section 17 details the bills horrible fantastic scheme. So once the fascist bill is approved, any electromotive force or as piring employer would be covered by it, which fashion that he/she would be legally regarded as an indirect government employee. The employers or companies who have the capacity (with more than 200 employees) would be mandated by law to provide reproductive health services to all employees in their own respective health facilities. This provision performer that those employers and companies with more than 200 employees need to have their own health facilities, and this means spare expenses on the part of job-creators. On the other hand, employers with less than 200 employees shall enter into partnerships with hospitals, health facilities, and/or health professionals in their areas for the delivery of reproductive health services. Logic tells us that since employers and companies would be legally required to shoulder excess expenses, then they are reassert to increase the prices of their products and/or services.Does anyone think of hurt CONTROL? The state control of the entir e medical industry is laid out under Sections 20 (Implementing Mechanisms) and 22(1) on banned acts. The penalty that awaits erring, non-compliant employers and health care providers could be imprisonment ranging from one (1) month to six months or fine of P10,000 to P50,000 or both. This means that any employer may be sued by his/her employees for non-compliant with the intents and provisions of the bill.Once the RH bill is approved, anyone who thinks of starting line a business, whether big or small, should hand the measures punitive provisions, some necessary expenses, and the need to deal with government regulators. In the United States, hundreds companies left the Democratic-infested atomic number 20 because of the states too much regulations and anti-business policies. This is why I have been sexual intercourse my blog readers that the bill is NOT simply about serving the alleged interests of the poor and women it is PRIMARILY about MORE authorities REGULATIONS.The bill i s about nanny statism or BIG GOVERNMENT. Already, many foreign investors do not want to invest in the Philippines because of its high tax rates, excessive economic regulations, pro-employee labor courts, leftist-activist court justices, among others. The Doingbusiness. orgrecently ranked Philippines 148th in terms of ease in doing business and 156th in terms of starting business. In terms of paying taxes, the country has been ranked 124th. Corporations pay a total tax rate (% profit) of 45. 8 percent If approved, the RH bill would have the following negative impacts on small business . It would be more difficult to start a new business considering the fact the the bill criminalizes the mere act of doing business and its regulative, interventionist provisions. 2. Employers would be forced to make special expenses so to cover the RH care unavoidably of their employees. 3. Since they are forced to make additional expenses, they might consider laying off some of their workers for surv ival. 4. Since they are forced to lash out additional expenses, they might not accept new applicants, a situation that would worsen the countrys unemployment rate. . Since they are forced to showcase out additional expenses, they might consider some of the following survival measure 1) salary cut, 2) less bonus or benefits, 3) cost cutting, 4) no expansion, 5) close business. 6. Since they are forced to shell out additional expenses, they might consider PRICE INCREASE. 7. There would be more informal sectors (unlisted, unregistered businesses) so to avoid paying more taxes and complying with government regulations. 8. electric potential and existing employers would be considered a crude CLASS OF CRIMINALS or ENEMY OF sociable JUSTICE. . Those who have the money and resources would rather invest in a business-friendly economic purlieu like Hong Kong, India and other Asian countries. 10. Employers would simply shrug. You can help the poor without enslaving and treating businessme n, doctors and some other people as potential criminals or enemies of social progress. Think like a human being, not like a parasite You dont help the poor and the marginalized by funding the RH bill its both the big and small businesses that can truly help them